CVE-2026-42010 @ Matrix
Status
not_applicable
Priority
1.86
Match score
3.0
Risk
AuthBypass
Remote
priv:user
CVSS
7.1 HIGH
Reason
cpe: gnutls; pkgs: gnutls-dane0; version: unknown (gnutls-dane0-3.7.9-2+deb12u7); risk:auth_bypass
Created
2026-08-03T02:35:42Z
Updated
2026-08-03T17:04:51Z
Closed
2026-08-03T03:27:38Z
Package interrogation (copy)
Run on the host — click to copy a command. Debian/apt
| Package | Commands |
|---|---|
| gnutls-dane0-3.7.9-2+deb12u7) | |
| gnutls |
Inventory lookup
Search package inventory across systems, then return here. Create a ticket on systems the matcher missed.
Suggestions: gnutls-dane0 · gnutls
| System | Matches | Ticket for CVE-2026-42010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matrix | libgnutls-dane0 3.7.9-2+deb12u7 | not_applicable open |
Same product CVEs in your queue
Other tickets that look like the same product (from match reason). Relate them here to triage this CVE as the primary.
| CVE | CVSS | KEV | Systems | Status | Matched | Already related | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-33845 | 7.5 | Library, Saiph, morris, mufasa | accepted_risk, does_not_affect | gnutls | — | ||
| CVE-2026-1584 | 7.5 | Library, Saiph, morris, mufasa | new | gnutls | — | ||
| CVE-2026-42009 | 7.5 | Library, Matrix, Saiph, morris, mufasa | not_applicable | gnutls | → CVE-2026-42010 | linked here |
Related CVE (same fix)
Point this ticket’s CVE at a higher-priority / same-fix primary so you only triage one.
Other CVEs related to this one as primary:
| Related CVE | Note | Tickets |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42009 | same product as CVE-2026-42010 | morris, mufasa, Library, Matrix, Saiph |
Host OS / kernel
OS
Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
(12)
· debian
Arch
x86_64
kernel_release
uname -r → 6.1.0-52-amd64kernel_version
uname -v → #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.180-1 (2026-08-03)For Linux kernel CVEs, kernel_version (Debian packaging / build string) often decides fixed vs not; kernel_release is used for upstream NVD range compares.
Same CVE on other hosts
Open the ticket for this CVE on another system.
| System | Status | Priority | Updated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| morris | not_applicable | 7.71 | 2026-08-22T10:15:30Z | Open |
| mufasa | not_applicable | 7.71 | 2026-08-22T10:15:30Z | Open |
| Library | not_applicable | 3.36 | 2026-08-22T10:15:30Z | Open |
| Saiph | not_applicable | 2.43 | 2026-08-22T10:15:30Z | Open |
Description
A flaw was found in gnutls. Servers configured with RSA-PSK (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman – Pre-Shared Key) wrongfully matched usernames containing a NUL character with truncated usernames. A remote attacker could exploit this by sending a specially crafted username, leading to an authentication bypass. This vulnerability allows an attacker to gain unauthorized access by circumventing the authentication process.
Determination
CVE-2026-42010 is an authentication bypass in GnuTLS. Practical Risk This only affects systems that actually use RSA-PSK authentication with GnuTLS. If you are not using RSA-PSK, the practical impact is low, but the package itself remains vulnerable. Quick Conclusion Unless you (or an application you installed) have explicitly configured RSA-PSK authentication, you are very unlikely to be using it, and the practical risk of CVE-2026-42010 is low even though the library is technically vulnerable.
Update status
Add note only
Mitigation log
2026-08-03T03:23:58Z — reviewing
CVE-2026-42010 is an authentication bypass in GnuTLS.
Practical Risk
This only affects systems that actually use RSA-PSK authentication with GnuTLS. If you are not using RSA-PSK, the practical impact is low, but the package itself remains vulnerable.
2026-08-03T03:26:40Z
Practical Reality
On a typical server (web hosting, mail, cPanel, etc.), RSA-PSK is almost never used.
Most systems that have GnuTLS installed use it for normal certificate-based TLS (HTTPS, IMAPS, etc.), which is not affected by this CVE.
2026-08-03T03:27:38Z — not_applicable
Quick Conclusion
Unless you (or an application you installed) have explicitly configured RSA-PSK authentication, you are very unlikely to be using it, and the practical risk of CVE-2026-42010 is low even though the library is technically vulnerable.
References
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13274
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20611
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20612
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20613
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26319
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26409
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29197
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30004
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30849
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30850
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:32962
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33125
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34764
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34788
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34790
NVD: CVE-2026-42010